Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Probono
So King if I understand you correctly the government is good when you agree with them and bad when you disagree with them? That's ok because that makes sense. Since you think 2257 will not withstand scrutiny by the courts how about offering to pay the legal expenses of the first person on the board arrested under the statute? After all if the law is wrong why should they have hundreds of thousands in legal fees?
This is the game played under Reagan's administration bring lots of prosections and financially exhaust the defendants.
In this land of democracy ( incidently, it is not a democracy but a republic) you would think government would not play such games.
I have spent many of my years as a good capitalist, a good activist for change and I am witnessing the dumbing of America. I still considering a change and so far I am planning trips to Canada and Costa Rica. I wish someone suggested the Netherlands since I love Holland but I believe that the problems of Europe are making that less attractive.
|
Well...I personally seldom agree with what government does...city...county state and federal government. My favorite bones have been picked with city and county as they have affected my business life more than any other.
If I am not mistaken the original 2257 has already been tested in the courts and has been upheld by the courts (I may be wrong). As for the new 2257 regs...I think it will be upheld by the courts...other than the secondary/publisher aspect of it. That seems to me to be redundant...and unecessary.
Of course I will not pay anyones legal fees...other than my own...if I must.