Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
Services like Google and AOL have generally not been held liable if they host CP or copyrighted material, why should they be liable if they host non-2257 content?.
|
"they generally have not been held liable" isnt a valid excuse or a valid legal argument..
In most old cases the focus is on search engine listing that by themselves dont constitute cp. But this is a whole new area.. google images , actually copies the images..
If google knowingly let cp images on google images they would be held liable i'm sure of it , just as a forum owner or website owner would, so i dont see how they suddenly would be exempt from providiing 2257.
If i make a replica of google images for adults , then it should be 2257 exempt if google is..
A spider that searches through fhg's with my code on them , just as google does.