Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CDSmith
It almost seems like a few of you fuckheads work for the government. :D
|
I didn't write the regulations and I don't support them. However, there are certain exclusions in the regulations and they are the same type of exclusions the government has been allowing all along. Why is it wrong to point it out?
Services like Google and AOL have generally not been held liable if they host CP or copyrighted material, why should they be liable if they host non-2257 content?
As I said before, this is nothing new.