Quote:
|
Originally Posted by basschick
the lawyer i talked to about this said the set is what matters, not just the image - and he is a well-known attorney. he explained it in a way that made sense, but i expect the other side could be explained just as well and make sense.
it was like this - the point of the law was supposedly to make sure that minors didn't participate in sexual activity. if the pic after the softcore pic showed her spread open, the entire shoot would be a sexual shoot, which the law is there to keep anyone from using or even shooting.
|
I am certain the programs are doing exactly as their legal counsel has advised. And in the end it's the lawyer who advises what he feels the law is and what he could defend against if need be.
I can respect a difference in opinion. And I am just a guilty in this thread as anyone else.
But I do feel it is counter productive to imply someone is doing something that is not legal or will be doing something that is not legal.
Thats dangerous ground to tread on, and could potentialy damage someones business or reputation.
I am doing what my lawyer advised and I would hope everyone is doing the same.