dopeman

i'm speaking of sponsors who say they have spoken with their laywers and this is how they interpret it. i believe you were in the same thread. i'm not calling out names, but there's only been a couple so far.

and i've read the thing many times, thanks.

considering the consequences of these regulations, affiliates should be asking these hard questions. to a lawyer, yes. but when two large sponsors with the money to acquire expensive legal counsel come to two completely different interpretations of the regulations, that had better get people thinking.

if one is right, every affiliate that doesn't have the model's ID for every photo they have ever posted in the past can get pinched.

of course these are 'ifs'. i'm not a lawyer.