Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
i am not going to read all the posts but i would guess that you are wrong. "sexually explicit" is pretty clear. you can't show a cock next to a girls pussy. the law already says that. and how do you think CP is defined? your logic says that sexually explicit pics of a minor also require penetration and its not sexually explicit if some old guys cock is just next to a little girls vagina. and am not going to look it up, but i doubt the law recognizes multiple definitions of "sexually explicit" but it does mention the pubic region and if multiple definitions do in fact exist, an attorney will tell you that you have to assume they all are applicable.
for the others... i highly doubt you can argue in court that a pic of an 18 year old licking cum off her lips is not sexually explicit regardless of whether or it is defined as such - and the other side of that is that the government probably will. so.... why risk it? stupid arguments like "it could be milk" are going to look pretty stupid to a judge given the context of the images, the context of the site, the content of similar sites, the history of these sites and the fact that there is no reason to assume it is not cum and endless reasons to assume it is.
|
Will not get into the CP angle because like I said CP is CP no matter how it is done if a minor is used.
There is vagueness in the revised statute as compared to the current statute. With the current statute simulated but not actual sex was exempt. (Before 1995 such companies like penthouse would never show penetration just dick close to it, after 1995 they would show penetration because the law clarified it and thus allowed them to do it.)
If you happen to watch showtime or HBO, you will notice they 2257 the material that is actually sexually explicit such as various episodes of Real Sex, where they do not 2257 any show or movie where the sex is simulated such as sex and the city where you would see pussy then see a guy go down on the pussy but never see mouth to pussy contact.
If using the reasoning that bodily fluids even semen are required by 2257 and always have been, why do we not see a 2257 disclaimer at the end of the movie there is something about mary? We clearly have a case of semen or possibly fake semen being used in production along with a masterbation scene.
I am not saying risk it, I am just talking opinion and how it is used and stated in the laws.