Originally Posted by dcortez

So in the 'chain of evidence', we're still relying on the primary producer for documentation verification and statement of authenticity.

From a practical standpoint, having 'copies of something' warranted to be 'real IDs' by primary producers on hand at the office of secondary producers really is not more valid (to the secondary producer/or law enforcement) than just having a statement/promise from the primary producer (traditional 'Custodian of Records') that the content was all produced with adults only as has been the case up to now.

What's the 'reasoning' again on having 'copies' of (maybe) valid IDs in the offices of secondary producers?

-Dino