View Single Post
Old 06-07-2005, 01:15 PM  
geeksta
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 157
"Although Sears did receive some letters of protest over their showing "this individual's nakedness," Sears maintains that nothing improper appeared in the picture. Their official explanation is that the "object" was a blemish caused by water or some other liquid falling onto the artwork during the printing process, and that the same picture (sans "object") appeared in the Spring catalog earlier that year."

So, if your parts just happen to fall out after June 23, you can do what Sears did and say it is a "water mark" or "scar" from the printing process. Problem solved!
geeksta is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote