Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PurrrsianPussyKat
Right now we are going through the thousands of galleries we have out there one by one and flagging anything questionable. The saddest part is, where do you draw the line? Take lightspeed, he said use softcore content. That's fine, but if the girl has her panties on and her legs spread wide open, or her hand over/covering/near her pussy are those compliant? No lascivious pics of the pelvic area. Go look that word up. Has a couple different meanings. Which one is the Judge going to pick? No simulated masturbation. So a hand in her panties or near her unseen pussy.. is that sim masturbation?
Oh and lets not forget headers and design elements. If you grabbed something from the sponsors tour to tie your galleries to the site more and it contains any pics you don't have papers for, they have to go.
A lot of our pages are going to be pulled. They have to. I'll take my lumps as far as bannings, I'd rather get banned than thrown in jail for 20 yrs.
|
this is EXACTLY what I have been thinking about lately.
Last night, i went through ALL of my galleries to see which ones were hardcore, had a (correct) 2257 link on it, banners/logos that have hardcore images in them, etc etc Its going to be a pain in the ass, but i decided to just make new pics & generic logos/banners to replace the hardcore ones.
Thats my plan, at least for now, until I find out whats going on with 2257. Hell, even lawyers dont understand the whole 2257 thing, it doesnt make any sense, it says to do 1 thing, but if you do that 1 thing, then you're breaking about 4 other DIFFERENT laws.....its retarded. So, i'm going to play it safe for now until 2257's "laws" are clear.