View Single Post
Old 06-06-2005, 04:43 PM  
chodadog
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by SleazyDream
trolls that don't understand how my system links to ads offer up proof of thier lack of understanding how my site serves up banners.
I'm assuming you're talking about posts like these:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quickdraw
Archive.org caches the script on the page, not the results.

When you visit sites that are on Archive.org, you get the cached script(just the script, not the results), BUT, the javascript results are pulling from the current database that the script designates.

This is why the banner still rotates in the 'archive'

If he had that javascript on there in 2002, you would get the 2005 data using Archive.org

Now, if you don't understand how this works, you might think about getting off his sack until you do.

Besides a few off color remarks and the usual idiot comments Sleazy is a decent guy imo, and I believe what he has to say on this subject.
What quickdraw failed to notice was that the .js file which your site links to was archived way back then, and thus the adverts being served on the archived page are the adverts that were being served at that time. The proof that this is the case is the fact that there are sites in the banner rotation on the archived page that do not appear in the current banner rotation.

Just compare these two files:

Current: http://sleazydream.com/horizontal.js
Old: http://web.archive.org/web/200406230.../horizontal.js

For example, you can see that there is a fatpaychecks website being advertised in the old rotation, and no fatpaychecks site currently being promoted. That is proof that what is showing up in the archives was indeed in the current banner rotation of the time the page was archived.

Just figured i'd clear that up.
__________________
26 + 6 = 1
chodadog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote