Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xxxjay
As it has been explained to me by an attorney there is no retroactivity with the new 2257. This is subject to debate and also the million dollar question.
Is a webpage published?
1. The day it goes live on the internet.
2. The day it goes live on the internet, then AGAIN ? when it is updates.
3. A webpage is published every time you log onto it.
From lawyers I have talked to, the DOJ will take the position that (3) ?A webpage is published every time you log onto it.?
Therefore retroactivity is moot.
|
well i'm not sure the definition of 'publish' is key issue here. have secondary publishers always been required to maintain model IDs?:
Quote:
Finally, regarding personal
information about performers that must be transmitted to secondary
producers, the Department again notes, first, that such information is
already required by the current Part 75 regulations
|
so by publishing these new regulations, is this giving the DOJ the right to go back and force inspections on any secondary producer who ever published an image even of they have since taken them down before june 23rd?
if that's the case, sponsors are effectively leaving their affiliates out to dry by not giving out the proper documents.