dopeman

i see. so under the first version of this law, there was no standard definition of 'secondary producer'?

under this version, a secondary producer is:

(2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles,
manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book,
magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer-
manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial
distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being
engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a
computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the
sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a
visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually
explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract,
agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.



that covers TGPs and gallery submitters. but earlier they say that a movie theater wouldn't be forced to comply. how is a movie theater NOT a secondary producer under these definitions?