|
Danny
Good stance, I think FHG is the only way to go that avoids exposing models.
HOWEVER, I'm not at all sure that using thumbs removes the requirement on affiliates to keep 2257 records themselves.
By the way, cropping is not allowed, i.e. making a safe thumb out of an unsafe image (where unsafe means "requires 2257 record keeping"). Such cropping means that the affiliate would expose themselves to the record keeping requirements.
I can just see the nice DOJ investigators and myself sitting at my kitchen table with the kids running around us, looking at my laptop screen and arguing about every thumb on my site whether it does or does not require 2257 record keeping. NO THANKS!
So while this is a step in the right direction (and kudos to you and LS), it does not entirely solve the problem for mom-n-pop affiliates.
IANAL but can anyone answer this: if we claim to have no 2257-covered content, do we still need to list an address on the 2257 compliance page?
|