View Single Post
Old 06-04-2005, 09:38 PM  
dopeman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcortez
I appreciate that we all agree that 2257 is plain wrong, but my specific question for this thread is:

Let's assume 2257 continues on course and the arrests begin.

If most of the arrests/convictions are proven (albeit after the fact) to NOT INVOLVE ANY CP and operators are going to jail for clerical errors only (non-compliance),

will the public support this or start to question it (as a tool against CP) after a while?

-Dino
any time 2257 is included in a news story about an arrest or raid, what will it say? "So and So was arrested for not complying with regulation 2257 which was designed to fight ch-ld p-rn0graphyy."

boom. the guy is a pederast in the mind of 'Joe Walmart' and he couldn't care less if he's in the pen even if the guy had published only photos of models over 18.

and since when does this administration give a flying fuck about 'public support'? they are completely above the law and do whatever they want.
dopeman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote