Quote:
|
Originally Posted by taibo
it's a lot of bullkaka
|
Once again, all talk and little action.
It's obvious XBix are just hunting for a topical headline.
If the defendant was committing illegal acts - there are far more serious charges than USC 2257 - namley "the defendant failed to keep records".
Did he have sex with under age girls? Did he abuse them? Did he assault them? Did he rape them? Or did he just "fail to keep records"? They seem to claim he was committing more serious illegal acts - why ain't they charged him?
A guy that "apparently" takes explicit pics of 13 year old kids is a weirdo anyway, - but the law, at least according to that article if it is reported accurately, is a total ass.
If that ain't a warped scenario all round - nothing is. Try another attention seeking heading XBiz.