Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jact
I agree wholeheartedly with that statement, but I'm not sure why he was only charged under 2257, it seems strange. Could they not have gotten him for a lot more?
|
unless i am missing something... it appears that someone wrote the article for Xbiz - at least i did not notice where it gives credit to anyone else. that should say quite a bit. obviously the guy was charged with a ton of shit - he used the mail, he produced CP etc etc etc etc. yet someone only wrote about 2257 out of context and ended up with a story that most agree makes little sense.
Luke Forde no longer occupies the last rung on the ladder of shitty, sloppy and irresponsible journalists.
