Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Raven
The guy's problems started with a complaint because he used the us post office to mail sexually explicit materials.
He also used underaged models. I don't see any charges for that....
I don't get it, either.
|
Oh I get why it started, and technically under the new regulations I can see how even if it went unpublished if they used the mail, then it qualifies under 2257, but it's an old case. He pleaded guilty before any new regs passed, and the way I read the article it felt like this was a blazing assult on the industry with the new regs, when in fact it wasn't? I dunno, poor reporting? Insighting fear? Who knows.