Originally Posted by AaronM

Sounds like bullshit to me....And here's why.


ATK requires all 2257 docs prior to paying you. You claim you were paid, then purchased the sets back.....You say they then sent you the release back. BFD......They probably have multiple copies of everything anyway....In fact, I know they do.

While it may be true that ATK no longer has a license for those images, I'm quite sure that they will remove them if you were professional about this instead of acting like an asshole by posting a simple issue like this on GFY and at the same time, damaging their reputation by stating that they are non-compliant with 2257.

Since the model DID sign the release and since you did issue a license and/or work for hire agreement, the best you could hope for is a copyright infringement case which probably would not hold much weight based on the other facts.

What you should have done was contacted them about this then issued a DMCA notification had they not responded.

If I were them, I would gladly pull the images then I would sue you for libel.

I hope Kim reads this thread then takes legal action.