Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheDoc
I'm sure a lot of programs are still trying to become compliant, much like myself. We are working our own 2257 issues and reproducing content that webmasters can use.
What bothers me is that RealityCash comes and says they are compliant, when they aren't. Just because you have the ID's on hand doesn't mean the galleries/sub domain is compliant, no banners, ads, etc, are compliant, the 2257 statement is incorrect, the 2257 page is incorrect.
Doesn't seem right that RC says they are, pulling webmasters in, when they aren't.
|
I agree with some of this.
The link to the 2257 page doesn't have the correct wording, and neither does the 2257 page.
The 2257 page states that RC is the secondary producer of the content and then has information for every content provider on the planet underneath.
If you shoot the content yourself then you are a primary producer.....and also under the new rules it doesn't matter if you're a primary or a secondary you need to list the custodian of records for the site.....RC is pointing them to other content providers.
That's not compliant with the new regs
