Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lenny2
So "no business" is worse than 5 years in jail?
How much "business" will you be doing from that jail cell?
And even to make this comparison you have to assume the people will quit surfing for porn and buying porn just because the porn sites moved to a different TLD.
|
Lenny, I usually agree with you on most things I have read, However I feel .xxx is far worse than the new 2257 reg's because...................
if your in compliance, your in compliance. It's the law, we have been made aware of this law, and it's time to do our job and follow the law. ( all set on my end btw). So there is/should be nothing to worry about in that regard.
However when a program is established and has been in business for a very long time, it has surfers that visit from bookmarks, and type-ins ( yes they still exist) A large part in that is a stable and memorized domain name. So with that being said. .xxx opens up the possibility of ISP blocks. This can never be viewed as a good thing. Aol gets a new CEO and he feels it is his moral duty to "protect" BAM block .xxx TLD's. Comcash, Brighthouse, all of these large cable companies do business with govt regulatory commisions, and deals happen. I wouild prefer to leave nothing to chance. The mere approval of .xxx imply's a NEED for it. And imho opens up a dangerous pathway.
I hope you understand where I am coming from.