Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tempest
I haven't understood this thinking either... The hosting companies don't police spam.. they don't police copyright violations.. they don't police CP... They need someone to report it to them.. And in the case of a porn site, unless it's missing the 2257 statment, there is no way to show that the owner of the site isn't meeting all the 2257 requirements. Unless of course the DOJ shows up, inspects and then goes to the hosting company. There's too much panic and not enough thinking going on regarding this 2257 issue.
|
Dunno what it will be yet - I ain't a lawyer - but we will not be hosting within US jurisdiction and not have a "2257 link" as such, but a legal one to replace this. It will refer to 2257 and some laws of other counties concerning protection of minors. We are not going to claim we are complying with the current 2257, but have no problem complying to the standards of 2257 prior to this amendment.