This shit is going to set off a lot of people's hahahahahahahahahahahaha:
http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/news/vfrd0605.cfm
It misquotes, slams, and lies about a lot of people that I know. The link above is to the whole artice. I posted the juicy bit:
Not to worry: cell phone porn is no problem, say spokespersons for the companies that produce and distribute pornography
Spokespersons for pornographers seem to think that self-righteous posturing can create public goodwill for this contemptible business.
When The American Family Association?s Donald E. Wildmon warned recently that the porn producers are planning to tap into the vast new market created by Internet-capable cell phones, Adult Video News Online (April 28, 2005) was predictably indignant, not at the report of the cell-phone market planning ? which they not only admit but boast of ? but at the notion that (in the words of Don Wildmon) ?pornographers are going after our children at a younger and younger age.? The very thought!
They want the world to believe that porn is okay for adults, and that they are protecting children from it.
They must know that pornography has been shown to be addictive and destructive for adults, that just as children were exposed to pornography by means of stationary telephones, so children will now be exposed to pornography by means of portable cell phones, and that adult pornography is used by pedophiles to seduce and desensitize their young victims.
AVN Online quoted ?industry legal expert? Mark Kernes who told AVN Online that the Wildmon warning is ?horsexxxx.? and continued in that vein. ?If anything, adult industry members (and most particularly Free Speech Coalition members) are going out of their way NOT to send their stuff to kids ? and besides, whatever Playboy does will be subscription only, and if kids are subscribing to Playboy, no matter in what format, it suggests that their parents are being derelict in their duties.?
So it?s ?derelict parents? we have to worry about, not the appearance of erotic and pornographic material on millions of cell phone screens around the world. When this flag-draped man (from the Free Speech Coalition, no less) speaks of ?horsexxxx,? he knows what he?s talking about.
AVN Online also quoted Joan Irvine, executive director of something called the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP), formerly Adult Sites Against Child Pornography ? also known by the letters ASACP. The name change doesn?t change the reality that ASACP is still working for pornography businesses.
Here?s a description of ASACP ?members? found on the organization?s web site:
Over 5800 adult sites, including some of the largest and most prominent ones including: AVN Online, XBiz, Epoch, ATKingdom, National Net, Adult.com, ARS, MaxCash, SilverCash, TopBucks, Traffic Cash Gold, Video Secrets, Southern Charms, Hot Movies, AdamEve.com, CyberAge, Cybersocket, Klixxx, Mansion Productions, Gallery Traffic Service, Sleazy Dream, Nichebucks, OrgasmCash, PlatinumBucks, Sex Key, FasterBucks, FTVCash, Web Air, Club Jenna, and Playboy.com have joined our cause in raising awareness about this subject.
Even assuming that ASACP members were serious about curbing child pornography doesn?t mean they are also serious about keeping children away from pornography, including the pornography persons of all ages can view without proof of age on many ?adult? websites.
And it certainly doesn?t mean that the ?adult? pornography they peddle is legal.
In a softball interview with Joan Irvine, Newsweek magazine (January 14, 2003) concluded that ASACP ?will soon start reviewing their members? sites and ? if no child porn is found ? bestow what [Joan] Irvine [of ASACP] calls a ?Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval? so visitors know there?s nothing illegal on the site.?
The words ?nothing illegal on the site? were volunteered by Newsweek, not Ms. Irvine. Remember, this is the publication that got the Koran-down-the-toilet story wrong.
Newsweek should have given its readers certain facts about obscenity laws that can be enforced against persons who distribute hardcore ?adult? pornography. Like these:
Federal obscenity laws prohibit, among other things, distribution of obscene materials by means of a common carrier, a facility of interstate commerce, an interactive computer service, radio communications, a telephone, a television and the U.S. mails.
40 of the 50 states have their own statewide obscenity laws.
People have gone to jail for obscenity law violations, on the Internet and elsewhere, and have had their property confiscated through criminal forfeiture laws and the application of RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) law to obscenity crimes.
Under the leadership of Attorney General Ashcroft, the Justice Department resumed enforcement of federal obscenity laws against commercial distributors of hardcore ?adult? pornography, and new Attorney General Gonzalez has indicated that he intends to ?strengthen? the Justice Department?s ?hand in prosecuting obscenity.?