Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kernelpanic
1) DOJ under the direction of some national porn czar.
2) Federal agents
3) Federal agents/US District Attorney
4) US District Attorney
5) US District Attorney
6) Hardworking taxpayers
|
It's one thing to have a law/regulations..it's quite another thing to be able to enforce them..or at least enforce them to any large extent. So many laws sit on the books now that are never enforced.
National porn czar? No creature exists..drug czar was a complete bust so there never will be a porn czar.
Federal agents? With the cutbacks in place now and those that still have jobs so overwhelmed, they're going to have the time to actually visit people's homes/places of business to look at tons of paperwork to see if it's in order?
U.S. District Attorneys? Do you know how many of them there are? Compare that to the number of porn sites there are in the U.S. They'd laugh you out of the office if you asked them about putting investigating porn sites paperwork as their top 1 or even top 10 priority.
Bush is in love with TAX CUTS! Hence, why there isn't enough money now to pay for EXISTING programs. Do you think Congress is going to raise taxes just to be able to hire beaurocrats to look at paper work? No way! We can't even fund enough airport security agents to make sure baggage is completely checked let alone hire "porn checkers".
While I agree people should "get their houses in order" due to this new set of regs, I also think there will be far and few between that actually end up in court.