View Single Post
Old 06-01-2005, 08:57 PM  
mardigras
Bon temps!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: down yonder
Posts: 14,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
Anything could be considered "sexually explicit" if you are paranoid, but then every show on MTV would be in violation. There is nothing illegal about MTV showing teens (including those underage) in bikinis and this law is not going to change that.
You can stick your head in the sand, we won't ridicle you. We're too busy watching jurisdictions try to ban "sexy" cheerleading.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
The term you use in your post is "obscene" and that's another one without a concrete definition. Obscenity hasn't caused the adult industry to die and neither will this.
Obscenity got put on a side track when planes went crashing into buildings. It's quiet enough now that if you look at the news you will see much activity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
Use common sense when it comes to what the government could get away with prosecuting you on when they say "sexually explicit".
Use common sense when you decide what you think the US government will prosecute.

Now go back and read the definition I posted of lascivious and compare that to the law as referring to the
"lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of
any person"
__________________
.
mardigras is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote