View Single Post
Old 06-01-2005, 07:35 PM  
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by mardigras
Before anyone gets too far away from the definition I posted above, a fully clothed cameltoe pic can be considered obscene according to the law.
Anything could be considered "sexually explicit" if you are paranoid, but then every show on MTV would be in violation. There is nothing illegal about MTV showing teens (including those underage) in bikinis and this law is not going to change that.

The term you use in your post is "obscene" and that's another one without a concrete definition. Obscenity hasn't caused the adult industry to die and neither will this. Use common sense when it comes to what the government could get away with prosecuting you on when they say "sexually explicit".

No matter what you do in the adult industry you take a legal risk, before and after the new 2257 rules.
__________________
Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote