|
I'm sure parts of the law will get injunctions.
You can't lie about content being produced in 1980 compared to 2000. It's easy to see a quality difference. And it doesn't mater anyway; if you REPRODUCE it after 1995 you need the ID anyway. It doesn?t mater much anyway, the only way we could use foreign content is if it was produced in that country and that model is from that country. If you don?t give the US company the ID, it just means you lose the business and they will go some place that will.
You won't find many loopholes, damn sure not any good ones.
You can?t have a national register for models, that?s about the largest violation of every right you could ever ask for. It would kill the industry and many wouldn?t do it.
This isn't the FBI, it's a DOJ taskforce.
I'm able to comply, with ease.. Just some work to get it all done. I think most webmasters are this way, even if you go full non-nude, it isn't going to change things. If US based programs only give out non-nude to all webmasters, I guess everyone will be on the same playing field. It?s stupid enough that programs are giving out ID?s anyway, it?s a violation of our own privacy act.
UK and Canada have extradition treaties, so good luck with not getting in trouble. You think if the DOJ calls your local GOV and says, hey we think this guy has CP that they won't react?
And this isn't going to kill the US porn business. MANY countries have very harsh porn laws and still do amazing business. Such as Germany, ZERO nudity/hardcore on the tours, must use a CC to view anything else. Business is going very strong for them. Even the UK has hash porn laws compared to the US when it comes to DVD production and distributing and that sure didn?t kill the business in the UK.
|