dcortez

I've just visited some of the top sites and looked at their current 2257/records statements hoping to see where the new wording is headed, and I noticed that quite a few sites which promote that they produce most of their own content are claiming to not be 'Primary Producers'.

Am I looking at old pages, or is this a legal tactic?

Some sites have a centralized page which is the destination of the 2257 link for the specific paysites, and while it my be true that the 'site' hosting the 2257 wording may not be a 'Primary Producer', someone following the link from the paysite gets the impression that the paysite is not a 'Primary Producer'.

I appreciate that there is a world of flux (and wait and see) going on right now, but because I have noticed this one several sites which I understood to have updated their 2257 protections, I thought I would ask.

Thanks,
-Dino