Quote:
|
Originally Posted by baddog
I will preface this comment by stating I am not an attorney, and by law am not allowed to dispense legal advise. No attorney-client relationship is established or implied. All opinions are based upon my own personal knowledge and experience. Any comments made are my own personal opinion. One should always consult with a licensed attorney, and not rely on opinions found on an adult message board. That being said:
Sorry, I don't read it that way. They declined that comment, the reason is really irrelevant. Besides:
|
Hmm, I'm not reading it that way. What they're referring to there is the practice of saying 'I don't have to keep records, my primary producer has them, I'm just a secondary'. In actuality, when you read the requirements for a copy of ID, nowhere does it say you can't block info, it just says it has to be a 'legible' copy. Well... define legible for the purposes of this regulation, and you've answered the question. I suspect legal precedents exist elsewhere for what constitutes a 'legible' copy of ID, when privacy concerns exist.