Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nysus
Curious if the sites were non-nude and non-sexual, if you'd have a problem with them? By law, if there's no sexual poses / unnatural (and non-sexual) poses then it's legal.
Matt
|
I'm not posting links to the sites but in my opinion they are clearly sexual.
Anyone who is going to tell me someone buying a membership for $25-45 per month for access to photos of girls in underwear is doing it for a non-sexual purpose is lying to and trying to convince themselves, not me.
If they were not sexual and we could see a clear purpose to the site then no, we would not have an issue with it. These sites however, in our opinion, are clearly sexual in nature.