Quote:
|
Originally Posted by New Hope
why do you still support ccbill then? They sell access to plenty of "non nude" sites?
I can understand removing processing for future clients, but if you remove a processor from an existing client you might be in for a nasty suprise when their lawyers knock on your door... it's called Tortious Interference... you're not allowed to purposely interfere with the contracts of others and the only purpose your move has is to interfere with sites who use that processor.
Who died and made you king?
|
I don't believe CCBill is processing for any underage sites. We did not remove them for non-nude, we removed them for under age.
No one made us "King". We're simply choosing not to do business with nor associate with someone supporting underage sites.
Also, I prefer to get my legal advice from our lawyers not from some anonymous poster with 4 posts who probably registered on GFY today. Thanks tho.