Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StickyGreen
ok you're right, each image does have a unique name, it's filename. so let's say you have 25,000 thumbnail images...your records are gonna have identification information for each model in each little thumbnail? that is ridiculous. i think it is very obvious that this law is meant to fuck over porn as a whole instead of check for underaged models.  |
In your office database you have the urls cross-referenced to your physical records..
i.e. http:/domain.com/image/thumb/girl1.jpg -> photo set lm34124 image img01239.jpg performer 8734
The record keeping only applies to sexually explicit images... But the fact is, there's a number of contradictions that make it confusing... Like one set that says you don't need records.. but that you do in order to say you don't.. that sort of thing... it's a piece of shit document... still means we have to figure out how to comply..