|
That's one I noticed earlier and exactly how I read it Aaron.
How they could prosecute someone simply for doing the work that they consider burdensome is beyond me.
It's VERY nice of them to think of the workload on primary producers, but if they so choose to do it, I can't imagine a problem.
The ONLY reason they give to NOT include it, is BECAUSE it's burdensome. To take it upon yourself to do it shouldn't be a factor. There is NOTHING that states the secondary producer must produce unsanitized records (that I'm aware of).
|