View Single Post
Old 05-25-2005, 12:55 PM  
Za Ha
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Still lost
Posts: 5,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by charly
Any more idiot ideas?

That was not an option before the changes to the law.

It's decided by what the original image contained not an edited one.
How can you prove the original picture if I have modified it enough to not make it recognizable.

Or if I photoshop it enough that it looks like a drawing? If this is not allowed then art depicting any sexually explicit content will not be allowed. So I guess judges will require 2257 to display pictures of old masterpieces...
Za Ha is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote