Quote:
I am sure many of you are aware of all the misinformation campaigns that have been so prevelant in this industry.
I am interested in serious business, and good hard workers that want to grow and reamian for the long haul.
I have no use for charletons, or bullshitters, or people that feel that misinforming another is something positive.
|
...and exactly how can we tell that something so secret you can't talk about isn't an idea from a "charleton"?
So far I have heard ideas like moving companies offshore, trust funds, and other "work arounds" all of which don't relieve the US based webmasters of his responsiblity towards the law. If anything, attempting to sit on the head of a legal pin is probably only going to make the DOJ more upset with you, and more likely to take action.
I didn't suggest anyone's business was a joke, nice high school debate club trick dude. This thread started as a joke, some people take it seriously, I can't stop them. The only thing that I think is a joke is someone who had a solution BEFORE the rules were published, and yet can't disclose it?
I understand your pain. Thumbstgps look to be a legal nightmare, and you are in the business of remote supply of thumb galleries. Your scrambling, your running, and your in a bit of a panic. I can understand that. But rather than cryptic "we have a solution we can't talk about" how about addressing the real issue of remote thumbs and how that can legally operate after june 23rd?
(Oh yeah, a cut down thumd from a hardcore image is still a hardcore image... you have to store the original so that is how it will likely be judged for 2257 purposes... so all headshots isn't going to solve it).
Please, again, I ask you to enlighen us, not talk down to us.
Alex