|
Oh fucking christ.
Stop twisting the story around KC (and others). This is getting downright fucking pathetic.
The kid made a weapon. Ever see those hard mcdonalds type trays? The ones where if you smash them they shatter into plexi-glass like shards? Guessing that's the type of plastic. It may as well be steel when driven through a ribcage.
So anyways, a kid has a weapon and needs to be subdued. He made threats. They went in, did what it took to take him down w/ the least amount of risk to themselves (i.e. knock his ass down HARD, and FAST), and then retrained him. Yeah, the kid got some bruises and shit, but thems the shakes when you threaten those bigger and badder than you. He deserved that.
The ONLY THING THAT HAPPENED WHICH WAS WRONG, was the *ONE PUNCH* thrown by *ONE GUY* while the kid was restrained. THAT was wrong. The one guy should probably be reprimanded and possibly suspended, and watched to see if it's an ongoing problem. A once-off like that I do not believe is grounds for dismissal, but that can be up for debate. The fact is the ONE GUY fucked up, and the rest of the guys tried to cover for him. Willing to bet they prolly restrained/told the guy to knock it the fuck off too.
I have absolutely NO fucking sympathy for the punkass kid. Do your time peacefully, and stop trying to be a little badass with an attitude problem. Sounds like he needed the shit kicked out of him a couple times when he was a kid growin up or something. Fucking lack of discipline.
Anyways, my opinion matters not. Stick with the facts is all I'm asking. One guy, threw one punch, and that is ALL that is being contested. The rest was 100% legal, and justified in the eyes of the law and any reasonable human. If you don't think taking the kid down by force was justified, you can go live with them on some island or something.
Shrug.
-Phil
|