Quote:
|
Originally Posted by baddog
|
[
nods]
It DOES seem odd -- you'd think that if EVER they meant for jurors to opine, that there'd be SOME "grassroots" PR component underway by now. This can only mean that the Government doesn't expect to have to burden the layman juror's ear with the finer points of 2257 -- OR -- that, if and when they do bring a 2257 matter to trial, the plaintiff argument won't require any
advance preparation in that jury's mind -- for being self-evident and uncontestable --
If the latter, it would be hard to imagine anything less to the Goverment's case than (the full evidentiary substantiation of) having found an actual under-age performer on some site --
j-