Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GatorB
Two commenters commented that the definition of producer in the
proposed rule was too broad and would encompass a convenience store
that sold sexually explicit magazines or a movie theater that screened
R-rated movies. The Department declines to adopt this comment. As the
rule makes clear, mere distributors of sexually explicit material are
excluded from the definition of producers and under no plausible
construction of the definition would a movie theater be covered merely
by screening films produced by others.
Ok so how is me making a TGP gallery different than a store selling a copy of Hustler? Logic would say I am only distributing the content. Hell I didn't shoot those fucking pics or movies. This law contridicts itself.
|
but you 'repackaged' them. So what if your TGP says 'hot nude 12 year olds' and shows other people's content of legal models? You are legitimately a secondary producer because you are changing how it is portrayed, and not just selling packaged content in a dust jacket.