View Single Post
Old 05-24-2005, 04:08 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
THEN TAKE IT OUT OF YOUR SIG, DUDE!! -- TILL THEN STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION!
I did, you replied too soon... as far as misinformation, try reading this again:


--------------------
I gave Michelle Freridge (Executive Director) a call to ask her this direct question:

When FSC is granted its injunction, will it cover only FSC members, or all adult websites?

Her answer is that "the injunction will ONLY cover FSC members. "
------------------


Now if you feel that Michelle is misinformed, then that's your beef with her. If their injunction does hold up and it does technically only cover FSC members, then you can post up in very small font how you were wrong.

If the injunction does cover anyone, i'm not wrong, i just posted up the direct answer to a direct question. what might be "wrong" is connecting the injunction issue with FSC membership.. but no different than connecting the .XXX issue with FSC membership, or connecting COPA with FSC membership, etc.. there are many reasons to be joining FSC.. pick one.


Fight the Disservice !
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote