Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kingfish
This thread should be closed it starts off with a very damaging incorrect reading of the regulations. If you follow that advice, your next worry will be what to do if you drop the soap in the prison shower.
|
I've read and reread the entire 16 pages at least 10 times today word for word, The excerpts posted by me and others are there but it gets contradicted(sic) in the deffs at the bottom of the whole thing (What I posted) I'm taking a shitload of heat for this post here and on other boards, due to wordings the DOJ chose to use. The regs say EVERYONE is liable and THEN it says that only producers and secondary producers are.
the actual deff of producer and 2ndry producer falls on the DOJ and only the DOJ, what WE think is correct or not means shit. but in the DOJ's wording affils are & are NOT 2ndry producers
the only thing I was trying to point out is that after the sentance about inserting images on a site, it goes on to say that if you mearly distro content or have nothing to do with making the content (iii) then you are NOT a secondary producer.
I'm deff not a lawyer nor would I want to be I dont feel I gave any advice unless you call what I said about posting a link to your sponsors 257 links on your sites to be advice, and if thats the case I'm far from the first person to voice that idea.
My only point that I'm trying to make (and like I said getting killed over) is the sky is not actualy falling just yet. This thing says one thing then changes from start to finish. I'm gonna sit back now and see what the lawyers have to say about all of this crap.
-Loki-