Originally Posted by JH3000

Under this rule all nudity, including photo "art" is sexually explicit for the purpose of the rule.

You are 100% right in that this is exactly where issues will be raised most however. Legal experts are debating that anything that implies sex can be sexually explicit. This means that they do not necessarily EVEN need to be nude to fall into this trap.

The interpretation/enforcement by officials will be the lawyers bread and butter here.