|
While various parts of 2257 are being challenged, there are many parts that will still stick.
The issue about requiring webmasters as secondary producers to have ID, will be one that i believe gets stuck down in the end.
The original part of 2257 about the webmaster being able to atleast identify where an images came from is one that will continue to be on the books. It makes sense, if an image is suspected to be under 18, then DOJ needs to know where/how to find the content producer.
So for webmasters who have "sexually explicit" content, document where the images came from that are on your site. It will take more work than just listing the content producers contact info on a 2257.html page
Being a FSC member or not, you still have some recordkeeping responsibilities to do.
Fight the Books!
|