Originally Posted by kane

to me it's confusing. One line says that people who put an image on a website are considered secondary producers. But then it says that people that distributes the content is not. I guess I don's see the difference. If I put some pics on a website and use that to send traffic to a sponser and get a commision from a sale how is that different from a store owner having a magazine that he sells and gets a commision on the sale.

I can see it both ways here.

ya gotta love the lawmakers