|
And the check this out:
Another commenter proposed that secondary producers be required to
store sanitized (i.e., without personal information such as home
address) hard or digital copies of performers' identification documents
along with a notarized affidavit from the primary producer stating the
location of the complete records. The Department declines to adopt this
comment. Although the Department understands the commenter's desire to
protect private information about performers from being too widely
disseminated, it believes that the suggested plan would be overly
burdensome on primary producers and add an unnecessary layer of
complexity to the record-keeping process. Primary producers would be
required first to sanitize the identification documents and then to
draft, sign, and pay for a notarized affidavit.
It is simpler and less burdensome simply to have primary producers transfer a copy of the records to secondary producers.
SO, THE GOVERNMENT HINKS ITS EASIER AND "LESS BURDENSOME" TO HAVE ME SEND 2257 DOCS TO THOUSANDS OF AFFILIATES, RATHER THAN KEEP MY OWN RECORDS?!!
|