In the following section, point a2 suggests to me that full female nudity, and the publishing thereof by either a primary or secondary producer is exempt.
For example, if I have actually uploaded a gallery which contains ONLY a nude female posing and not sticking a dildo in her hole, then the gallery cannot even be described as simulated wanking?
- LOL - I had to laugh.
Ok, it has to stand true then - that the definition of "sexually explicit" has not been defined.
Is a pair of tits explicit? Is a fanny shot explicit? Is the fanny shot explicit - but youre ok cos its a "simulated fanny" shot - due to the fact it aint got a cock in it?
Whats explicit? Is posing with her arse in the air - alone - engaging in sexually explicit conduct? If not - then solo nowanks are fine yes?
This means that a large majority of banners are exempt - and also means - that as a tgp gallery poster - you may be able to get away with tit and fanny shots - which would be good for sales cos the hardcore stuff along with the documents is at the sponsor.
This is just my interpretation - do you guys think its a reasonable one?
For example again - one could perfectly legally - without maintaining documents, either as a primary or secondary producer - totally naked galleries of couples just pretending.
And if you can do that cos is simulated then FULL NUDITY AND LEG SPREADING ASS SHOTS are surely exempt if the woman is alone????
Any thoughts guys and girls?