Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GatorB
Once again so? That's just BS talk for these rules. I'm talking YOUR personal LOGICAL opinion. Should a regular Joe be under MORE regualtions than someone who owns say 20 porno shops each with 10's of 1000's of movies, mags etc? I might as well just go own a porno shop because acccording to these rules I'm not required to have records to make sure that the movies I'm selling don't have underage girls in them. Hmmmmmmmm.
|
Hey I'm not a fan of these rules at all, no more than anyone else here.
However, I still see a very logical difference between someone who inserts images onto a web page and publishes the page, and someone who works in a convenience store that sells Hustler magazine.
Personally I don't think requiring everyone who publishes porn to have copies of the ID's is a bad thing. When you think about it, the only way you can know for sure that the model is/was over 18 is to see the ID. Otherwise you're just taking the word of the photographer.
My problem with the rules is the burdensome way in which they're being implemented....copies of depictions cross referenced with urls and people having to put their home addresses on web pages and shit like that.