Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iceicebaby
If sonofsam broke the tos of the contract with Aaron .... sonofsam doesn't have a leg to stand on. It it the onus of the person that agrees to the contract to understand said contract. It is not the fault of the person who issued the contract for the person signing to understand what he is signing.
From what I have read Sonofsam has broken the tos and has no reason to bitch. Aaron has protected himself with the tos and sonofsam is pissed cause he is out money for breaking the contract with Aaron.... nobodys fault but sonofsam..... take it to court.... Aaron would win hands down
|
Just for clarification...When you say contract, I assume you are referring to my right to enforce my license agreement. Am I correct?
If so, I know somebody will of course post that the license was never issued in the first place...And they would be right in saying that. In most cases, content providers do not go around issuing licenses for content packages that have not been fully paid for. That does not mean that the purchaser has the rights to violate that license simply because it has yet to be issued. You violate, you lose your rights. PERIOD.