Originally Posted by Clicky_Bucks

Let's summarize this thread:

1. Customer is unhappy with content purchased and expresses it in private with provider.

2. Provider doesn't meet customer's needs.

3. Provider puts customer on ignore on ICQ and doesn't return phone messages.

4. Dares customer to bring it to GFY.

5. Once brought to GFY, provider of content tells customer to post examples of content.

6. Once examples are posted, provider of content feels he caught customer in a trap and threatens to sue.

7. After this point, the original issue of crappy content which customer didnt want to begin with is ignored as provider capitalizes on new issue of using unlicensed content, even though he had told him to do so.

8. Along the way, most of the original issues are ignored so content provider can feel justified in stealing 3600 dollars from customer.