View Single Post
Old 05-22-2005, 09:12 PM  
Kingfish
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 668
Not so crazy where in the statute does it say the actually explicit part has to be showing? As to far as not knowing yourself that makes it a little difficult and practically speaking the DOJ would have to have the original picture to prove their case, but the point being if you are making a thumb and then linking a thumb to a gallery with the original picture it would make it easy for them to figure it out.

As to your second point, I believe the proposed regulations ( I am too lazy to look it up right now) something to the effect of whoever inserts into a website?

So that would mean hot linking wouldn?t save you from the 2257 requirements.
Kingfish is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote