Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
A jury would have to convict you of a "child porn charge" without any evidence. Do you think many juries are going to convict someone of "child porn" because their valid paperwork, which proves the models are of legal age, are not in alphabetical order? Maybe someone too stupid or poor to hire good lawyers. Even if you did get convicted for a filing error, you have a pretty strong appeal if they try to make it stick as a "child porn" case and you can prove the models are all of legal age.
|
With child porn you are tried in both the courts of law and the court of public opinion.
I've had malicious child pornography production allegations levied against me in the past (I've never produced any content in my life) and some of the content providers that I explained the situation to and requested documentation from have treated me differently from that day on.
Luckily I got a heads up before the raid and pulled all the HD's out of my computers so they couldn't shut the business down. The investigation was dropped and I luckily never ended up in court.