Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jayeff
It's good that you have a reasonable handle on the old 2257 regs, but where have you been the last few months? Unless what has just passed into law is considerably softer than the original proposals, one major difference is that everyone displaying sexually explicit material is now responsible for keeping their own records.
As someone else noted, the only way to get affiliates who want to use more than heavily censored content off the hook, is if the sponsor hosts the content and the affiliate is therefore not the page/site operator.
|
The news link xxxjay posted in a different thread mentioned the producer having to have proper identification on hand to be able to prove age, it mentions nothing about publishers of content, other than the 'old' 2257 (unless there has been a big update I missed, is possible) which states that any publishers must state where the content's producer is and their contact information, so they can quickly check to see if models are of age.
Matt